From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Klapak v. Blum

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 30, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 670 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued April 24, 1985

Decided May 30, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court in Suffolk County, William R. Geiler, J., George A. Murphy, John W. Burke, JJ.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Eugene E. Zegarowicz, Maryellen Weinberg and O. Peter Sherwood of counsel), for appellant.

Mindy S. Fridovich and Leonard S. Clark for Mary Klapak, respondent.



Judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs. The issue argued on appeal, not having been considered by the administrative agency in making its determination, may not be reviewed by this court ( Matter of Barry v O'Connell, 303 N.Y. 46).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER. Taking no part: Judge TITONE.


Summaries of

Matter of Klapak v. Blum

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 30, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 670 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Klapak v. Blum

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARY KLAPAK, Respondent, v. BARBARA B. BLUM, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 30, 1985

Citations

65 N.Y.2d 670 (N.Y. 1985)
491 N.Y.S.2d 615
481 N.E.2d 247

Citing Cases

In re Kearney

The Supreme Court erred in considering the petitioners' claim that their property was exempt, under the…

Wagner v. Fiala

Here, the evidence adduced at the hearing demonstrated that the police gave the petitioner sufficient warning…