Opinion
October 22, 1951.
On February 27, 1950, this court affirmed an order granting respondent's motion for leave to serve a notice of claim after the expiration of the statutory period prescribed by section 50-e Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law ( 276 App. Div. 981). Thereafter, appellants moved to vacate the order granting respondent such permission on the ground that it had been fraudulently obtained. Resettled order denying appellant's motion affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.