From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kin Pun Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 1991
169 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

January 15, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Jacqueline Silbermann, J.].


Through the testimony of two New York State Troopers, respondent established that the petitioner's barmaid served alcoholic beverages to two under-aged women, each of whom furnished a false name to the Troopers. The officers located one of the females who had been served a drink in the bar, even though she denied, at the hearing, having been in the bar that night. Under the circumstances, the respondent's determination is supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Harry's Chenango Wine Liq. v State Liq. Auth., 158 A.D.2d 804, 805). Further, the penalty imposed was not excessive (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Kin Pun Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 1991
169 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Kin Pun Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KIN PUN CORP., Doing Business as HAPPY RESTAURANT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 15, 1991

Citations

169 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
564 N.Y.S.2d 161