Opinion
March 31, 1994
Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.
Evidence in the record supports the Board's finding that claimant, who had been employed as a kennel attendant, was guilty of misconduct when he violated the employer's rule concerning
bringing animals to the employer's place of business and, when directed to comply with that rule, failed to do so and acted in an insubordinate manner. We have considered claimant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.
Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.