Opinion
2010-05002.
Decided on October 18, 2011.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the New York State Department of Correctional Service dated June 3, 2009, as affirmed so much of a determination of a hearing officer dated March 11, 2009, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, as found that the petitioner had violated, inter alia, 7 NYCRR 270.2(B)(14)(iv) by possessing an unauthorized type of medication, and imposed penalties.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Richard O. Jackson of counsel), for respondents.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, RANDALL T. ENG, SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
DECISION JUDGMENT
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, the testimony adduced at the Tier III disciplinary hearing, and the "Contraband Drug Testing Directive" regarding narcotics identification kits and the testing procedures for contraband provided substantial evidence to support the hearing officer's determination that the petitioner possessed an unauthorized type of medication in violation of 7 NYCRR 270.2(B)(14)(iv) ( see Matter of Mills v Fischer , 85 AD3d 1033 ; Matter of Maxwell v Fischer , 74 AD3d 1342 , 1343; Matter of Brown v Selsky , 38 AD3d 657 ; Matter of Rincon v Selsky , 28 AD3d 565 ).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
MASTRO, J.P., FLORIO, ENG and SGROI, JJ., concur.