From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kaufmann

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1965
15 N.Y.2d 825 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued January 5, 1965

Decided February 11, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, S. SAMUEL DI FALCO, S.

Milton Pollack and Irving K. Rubin for appellant.

Milton W. Levy, John W. Castles, III, and Leonard S. Leaman for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs to respondents payable out of the estate, in a memorandum: Where, as here, the record indicates that testator was pliable and easily taken advantage of, as proponent admitted, that there was a long and detailed history of dominance and subservience between them, that testator relied exclusively upon proponent's knowledge and judgment in the disposition of almost all of the material circumstances affecting the conduct of his life, and proponent is willed virtually the entire estate, we consider that a question of fact was presented concerning whether the instrument offered for probate was the free, untrammeled and intelligent expression of the wishes and intentions of testator or the product of the dominance of the beneficiary ( Matter of Smith, 95 N.Y. 516; Marx v. McGlynn, 88 N.Y. 357; Matter of Putnam, 257 N.Y. 140; Matter of Satterlee, 281 App. Div. 251, 254).

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Matter of Kaufmann

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1965
15 N.Y.2d 825 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

Matter of Kaufmann

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of ROBERT D. KAUFMANN, Deceased…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 11, 1965

Citations

15 N.Y.2d 825 (N.Y. 1965)
257 N.Y.S.2d 941
205 N.E.2d 864

Citing Cases

In Matter of Zirinsky

4. whether the person who allegedly wielded undue influence was in a position of trust ( Matter of Elmore, 42…

Will of Antonetz

2 AD2d 260, 269 [2d Dept 1981]). Among the factors that are considered are: (1) the testator's physical and…