From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kabel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 9, 1999
267 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Decided December 9, 1999

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 28, 1998, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Charles W. Kabel, Eden, appellant in person.

Lynn R. Kabel, Kabel's Gas Service Inc., Eden, for Kabel's Gas Service Inc., respondent.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Steven Segall of counsel), New York City, for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

BEFORE: CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, PETERS, SPAIN and GRAFFEO, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

While collecting unemployment insurance benefits, claimant failed to report to the local unemployment insurance office the services he performed for his wife's gas well service and maintenance corporation, of which his wife was a 51% shareholder and he was a 49% shareholder. Claimant conceded that, during the relevant periods, he occasionally performed repair work on the corporate truck, purchased fuel for the truck and the oil well service rigs, purchased or signed for business-related supplies and attended corporate meetings. Additionally, claimant — who had previously owned the business as a sole proprietor prior to its incorporation — admitted that he sometimes provided his wife with technical advice concerning gas well maintenance. The office of the corporation was located in claimant's home and he used the corporation's truck for personal and business matters. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that, during the periods claimant received benefits, he was a true principal in an ongoing corporation for which he continued to perform significant and regular services and, thus, was not totally unemployed. Additionally, the Board charged him with a recoverable overpayment of benefits and assessed a forfeiture penalty of benefit days upon finding that claimant had made willful false statements to obtain benefits.

We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the Board's assessment of claimant's credibility and the inferences it drew from the evidence presented (see, Matter of Falco [Sweeney], 246 A.D.2d 711, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 815) as well as the separate findings of willful misrepresentation (see, id.; see also, Matter of Perkins [Commissioner of Labor], 256 A.D.2d 679; Matter of Tenore [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 749; Matter of Silverstein [Sweeney], 236 A.D.2d 757, 758). Claimant's remaining arguments have been examined and found to be unpersuasive under the circumstances.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Kabel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 9, 1999
267 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Kabel

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE CLAIM OF CHARLES W. KABEL, Appellant. KABEL'S GAS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 9, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 605

Citing Cases

In re James

Even if it could be accepted that claimant's participation in the corporate business was minimal, so long as…

In re Claim of Petrillo v. Comm., Labor

admitted that he had received the unemployment insurance information handbook which explains the requirement…