From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Joshua

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 2, 1996
227 A.D.2d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 2, 1996

Appeal from the Family Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.).


We reject the contention that petitioner failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that respondent engaged in conduct which, if committed by an adult, would be a crime (Family Ct Act § 342.2). At the fact-finding hearing, respondent's schoolmate, Matthew Burin, testified that he was with respondent and several other of their friends at the residence of Sarah DeSantis on the evening of May 20, 1994. At that time, he observed respondent damaging a bicycle by repeatedly "stomping" on it, bending the bicycle's frame and front and rear rims. Although the evidence established that Burin had first accused another youth of performing the act and Burin's testimony was contradicted by substantially every other person who was present on the scene, Family Court expressly credited Burin's testimony and rejected the contrary evidence, finding it to be incredible.

Fundamentally, Family Court serves as the trier of fact, and its credibility determinations are to be accorded great weight ( see, Matter of Tiffany H., 216 A.D.2d 738, 739; Matter of Gaylord II., 106 A.D.2d 823, 824-825). Conferring the appropriate deference to Family Court's resolution of the conflicts in the hearing testimony and viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to petitioner ( see, supra), we are constrained to conclude that the evidence established respondent's commission of conduct constituting the crime of criminal mischief in the fourth degree ( see, Penal Law § 145.00) by the requisite standard of proof. We are similarly unpersuaded that Family Court abused its discretion in refusing to substitute a finding that respondent is a person in need of supervision for the finding of juvenile delinquency ( see, Family Ct Act § 311.4).

Mikoll, J.P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Joshua

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 2, 1996
227 A.D.2d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Joshua

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSHUA J., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 2, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 741

Citing Cases

In re Shena SS.

Although respondent's mother testified as to her specific recollection that respondent was either sick,…

Matter of Joshua F

However, the evidence at the fact-finding hearing established that respondent consciously aligned himself…