Opinion
April 20, 1998
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
The respondent Police Department of the City of New York proffered substantial evidence that the petitioner violated Patrol Guide § 110-49, Page 1, Paragraph 1, and § 104-1, Page 3, Paragraph 4, by failing to report an offer of a bribe and by wrongfully divulging what he believed to be confidential law enforcement information ( cf., Matter of Boyd v. Constantine, 81 N.Y.2d 189, 196). Accordingly, the determination of the respondent Commissioner of the Police Department of the City of New York must be confirmed.
The petitioner's remaining contention does not provide a basis for annulment.
Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.