Opinion
June 17, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The record establishes that the petitioner was employed by the respondent on a temporary basis (see, Civil Service Law § 64). Accordingly, the petitioner was not entitled to any of the advantages secured by tenure, including review of her discharge under the provisions of Civil Service Law § 75 (see, Matter of Roberts v. Parker, 52 A.D.2d 651; see also, Matter of Rivera v Beekman, 86 A.D.2d 1; Matter of Ause v. Regan, 59 A.D.2d 317, 323).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Joy, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.