From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Jones v. Houck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 2001
280 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

February 7, 2001.

Appeal from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Flemma, J.H.O. — Custody.

Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Family Court did not abuse its discretion in awarding primary placement of the child to respondent father. Contrary to petitioner mother's contention, the court properly weighed the appropriate factors affecting the best interests of the child ( see, Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 172-173; Matter of Paul C. v. Tracy C., 209 A.D.2d 955, 956), "and the change made to the preexisting custodial arrangement has a sound and substantial basis in the record" ( Matter of Schimmel v. Schimmel, 262 A.D.2d 990, 991, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 817).


Summaries of

Matter of Jones v. Houck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 2001
280 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Jones v. Houck

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF COLLEEN R. JONES, APPELLANT, v. ALEXANDER M. HOUCK, SR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 7, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 878

Citing Cases

Matter of Albert S. v. Pamela G. M

Memorandum: Respondent waived the right to a plenary hearing on the custody petition and thus Family Court…

In re Chappell

With respect to the merits, we conclude that the court was in the best position to evaluate the character and…