From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Johnson v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 7, 1999
261 A.D.2d 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 7, 1999

Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.


Determination unanimously annulled on the law without costs and petition granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination that he violated inmate rule 107.20 ( 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [8] [iii]). The Hearing Officer erred in refusing to call inmate witnesses requested by petitioner and in failing to provide a reason for that refusal ( see, Matter of Boodro v. Coughlin, 142 A.D.2d 820, 823). The record establishes that the testimony of those witnesses would have been material and not redundant, and there is no indication that permitting their testimony would have jeopardized institutional safety or correctional goals ( see, 7 NYCRR 254.5 [a]). Thus, the failure to call those witnesses requires that the determination be annulled and the petition granted ( see, Matter of Campbell v. Hollins, 249 A.D.2d 994; Matter of Adams v. Coughlin, 202 A.D.2d 1055; cf., Matter of Laureano v. Kuhlman, 75 N.Y.2d 141, 147-148). In view of our decision, we do not reach petitioner's remaining contentions. Respondents are directed to expunge all references to this incident from petitioner's file. (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Parker, J.)


Summaries of

Matter of Johnson v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 7, 1999
261 A.D.2d 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Johnson v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DERRICK M. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 7, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 221

Citing Cases

Matter of Raqiyb v. Goord

Petitioner contends that he was improperly denied his right to call witnesses at the hearing and that the…