From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Jewish Reconst. Synagogue v. Levitan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 12, 1974
316 N.E.2d 339 (N.Y. 1974)

Opinion

Argued May 7, 1974

Decided June 12, 1974

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, ROBERT C. MEADE, J.

John M. Farrell, Jr., C. Ellis Schiffmacher and Stephen G. Limmer for appellant.

George C. Pratt and Samuel S. Tripp for respondents.

Kenneth S. Diamond for intervenors-respondents.


MEMORANDUM. Respondents' motion to dismiss the petition raised only the issue of the power of the Board of Appeals to grant the special permit sought by the synagogue. We agree with the determinations below that the board had no such power or authority.

The Village Board of Trustees delegated authority to the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant special permits for religious and educational uses. That delegation, however, mandated a 100-foot side-yard setback restriction as to each such special permit. Here the synagogue requested a special permit without the side-line setback. Under the delegation the Board of Appeals had authority only to grant special permits on the conditions prescribed by the Village Board; it had no power or authority to waive or to modify any of the explicit conditions laid down by the Village Board (cf. Matter of Texas Co. v. Sinclair, 304 N.Y. 817, affg. 279 App. Div. 803; Matter of Plotinsky v. Gardner, 15 A.D.2d 563; Matter of Lynch v. Gardner, 15 A.D.2d 562; Matter of Board of Educ. v. Wolf, 10 A.D.2d 713).

There is not presented here any issue as to the power of the Board of Appeals to grant variances under section 7-712 (formerly § 179-b) of the Village Law or otherwise. As to the distinction between a special permit and a variance (see, e.g., 2 Anderson, New York Zoning Law and Practice [2d ed.], § 18.02).

In the procedural posture in which this case comes to us we do not reach any constitutional issue. We note, however, the pendency of a related action for a declaratory judgment in which presumably all such issues will be ventilated.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STEVENS concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Jewish Reconst. Synagogue v. Levitan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 12, 1974
316 N.E.2d 339 (N.Y. 1974)
Case details for

Matter of Jewish Reconst. Synagogue v. Levitan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST SYNAGOGUE OF THE NORTH SHORE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 12, 1974

Citations

316 N.E.2d 339 (N.Y. 1974)
316 N.E.2d 339
359 N.Y.S.2d 55

Citing Cases

Real Holding Corp. v. Lehigh

II. The legislative history, prior case law, and dictionary meanings of "dimensional" and "physical" support…

Bright Horizon v. Appeals Bd.

Petitioner's attack on the constitutionality of the ordinance as applied must, therefore, fail. It should be…