From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Jessup v. Wrigley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1929
166 N.E. 325 (N.Y. 1929)

Summary

In Matter of Jessup v. Wrigley (250 N.Y. 563) it was held that an employee, whose duty it was to go at night to his employer's greenhouses and tend to the fires, and who was killed on his way to his home from the greenhouses, was at the time of the accident in the course of his employment.

Summary of this case from Shauntz v. Schwegler Brothers, Inc.

Opinion

Argued February 11, 1929

Decided March 19, 1929

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Neile F. Towner for appellants.

Hamilton Ward, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Jessup v. Wrigley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1929
166 N.E. 325 (N.Y. 1929)

In Matter of Jessup v. Wrigley (250 N.Y. 563) it was held that an employee, whose duty it was to go at night to his employer's greenhouses and tend to the fires, and who was killed on his way to his home from the greenhouses, was at the time of the accident in the course of his employment.

Summary of this case from Shauntz v. Schwegler Brothers, Inc.
Case details for

Matter of Jessup v. Wrigley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of KATHARINE JESSUP, Respondent, against G.P…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 19, 1929

Citations

166 N.E. 325 (N.Y. 1929)
166 N.E. 325

Citing Cases

Shauntz v. Schwegler Brothers, Inc.

It was held that she received her injuries in the course of her employment. In Matter of Jessup v. Wrigley (…

Matter of Graves v. Northwood Mfg. Co., Inc.

Present — Van Kirk, P.J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to…