From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MATTER OF JERRY YY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 23, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93495

Decided and Entered: October 23, 2003.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Clinton County (Lawliss, J.), entered October 23, 2002, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 3, to adjudicate respondent a juvenile delinquent.

Alan J. Burczak, Plattsburgh, for appellant.

Dennis D. Curtin, County Attorney, Plattsburgh (Van Crockett of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Rose and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Petitioner commenced this proceeding alleging that respondent took a vehicle from his residential educational institution and drove it 25 miles on a state highway. At a brief first appearance in Dutchess County Family Court, respondent entered an admission to acts which would constitute the crime of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree. No parent was present at that appearance. After the matter was transferred to Clinton County for disposition, respondent was placed on probation for one year.

Reversal is required. Family Court failed to properly advise respondent of his rights to remain silent, to a hearing, to have counsel of his own choosing and of the possible specific dispositional orders (see Family Ct Act § 320.3, 321.3; Matter of Walker, 144 A.D.2d 306; Matter of Delfin A., 123 A.D.2d 318, 319). Although not directly raised by counsel, we note that the court also failed to make any effort to procure his parents' attendance at his arraignment and admission (see Family Ct Act § 320.3;Matter of James T., 304 A.D.2d 864; Matter of Felicia C., 178 A.D.2d 530; Matter of Delfin A., supra at 319; see also Family Ct Act § 321.3). Given the court's failure to fully advise respondent and his parents of his rights, the court did not adequately determine the voluntariness of his waiver of those rights prior to accepting his admission (see Family Ct Act § 321.3; Matter of Gregory C., 202 A.D.2d 273, 274). As respondent's period of placement has expired, the petition should be dismissed (see Matter of James T., supra; Matter of Joshua HH., 299 A.D.2d 760, 760-761).

Crew III, J.P., Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

MATTER OF JERRY YY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 23, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

MATTER OF JERRY YY

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JERRY YY., ALLEGED TO BE A JUVENILE DELINQUENT. IAN G…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 23, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 126

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Marquis K.S

There is no merit to those contentions. Family Court Act § 320.3 requires that, when "respondent first…

In re David T

As the appellant argues, and as the respondent correctly concedes, the allocution conducted at the…