From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Jandorf

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Jan 14, 1964
41 Misc. 2d 712 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1964)

Opinion

January 14, 1964

Netter Netter ( Hector G. Dowd and Richard Netter of counsel), for Lore Sloane, as executrix of Richard Sloane, deceased, respondent.

Debevoise, Plimpton, Lyons Gates for Morgan Guaranty Trust Company, as temporary administrator and executor.

Finkelstein, Benton Soll for United HIAS Service, Inc. Padgug Laurence for Home of Old Israel, Inc. Proskauer, Rose, Goetz Mendelsohn for Greater New York Fund and another, respondents.

Moses Haas ( Fritz Moses of counsel), for Helen Jandorf.


In this accounting proceeding a question is presented as to whether a direction in the will against the apportionment of estate taxes requires the residuary estate to bear the burden of a so-called "acquirer" tax assessed by the German Federal Republic against a legatee residing in West Germany. But for the direction in the will, Federal and New York estate taxes would be apportionable among all the testamentary beneficiaries in accordance with the provisions of section 124 of the Decedent Estate Law. Inasmuch as that statute was drawn to accomplish an equitable apportionment of Federal and State taxes (Combined Reports of the Commission to Investigate Defects in the Laws of Estates, p. 338), it is not to be assumed that the tax clause in this testator's will was prepared with foreign taxes in mind. The "acquirer" tax does not appear to be an "estate, inheritance, succession and other death tax" either as understood by this testator or as understood and defined by our courts. This tax arises solely because of the beneficiary's residence in Germany and is assessed against him personally.

"It has been held, and is a principle universally recognized, that the revenue laws of one country have no force in another." ( Marshall v. Sherman, 148 N.Y. 9, 25.) This court will not enforce the tax law of a foreign jurisdiction against property located here and forming part of a resident estate. ( State of Colorado v. Harbeck, 232 N.Y. 71; Marshall v. Sherman, supra; Matter of Baer, 161 Misc. 797; Matter of McNeel, 10 Misc.2d 359; Matter of Lamar, 15 Misc.2d 544; Matter of Robinson, 25 Misc.2d 9.) Distribution may be made to the residuary legatees without retention of any reserve for foreign taxes.

The personal claim of the corporate fiduciary for custodial services in the sum of $78.11 set forth in Schedule D-a is approved.


Summaries of

Matter of Jandorf

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Jan 14, 1964
41 Misc. 2d 712 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1964)
Case details for

Matter of Jandorf

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of MORITZ JANDORF, Deceased

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County

Date published: Jan 14, 1964

Citations

41 Misc. 2d 712 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1964)
246 N.Y.S.2d 378

Citing Cases

Matter of Williams

3. Puerto Rico claims jurisdiction to levy the tax solely by reason of the domicile of the recipient in…

Estate of Herz v. American Parkinsons Disease Ass'n

In dicta, he arbitrarily designated the Erbschaftsteuer as an "acquirer tax," describing it as "a tax against…