From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Jackson v. Portuando

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 9, 1997
243 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 9, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court in Ulster County.


Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit refusing to obey a direct order and refusing to comply with a staff member's direction to move. Presented in evidence at petitioner's disciplinary hearing was the misbehavior report, authored by a correction officer, who stated that he had repeatedly ordered petitioner to pack up his possessions or to allow correction officers to pack them up for him in preparation for moving to another cell, to which petitioner had responded, "I'm not moving. Come in and get me." Petitioner himself testified that he had refused to comply with these directives. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the determination of petitioner's guilt ( see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be either without merit or unpreserved for our review.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Jackson v. Portuando

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 9, 1997
243 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Jackson v. Portuando

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NATHANIEL JACKSON, Petitioner, v. LEONARD PORTUANDO, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 347

Citing Cases

Filsaime v. Sabourin

The misbehavior report by itself was sufficiently detailed to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's…