From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Jackson v. Orenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 17, 2000

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondents "from acting in excess of their authority" in a criminal action entitled People v. Erwin Jackson pending under Nassau County Indictment No. 58630.

Erwin Jackson, Beacon, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Owen B. Walsh, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Richard S. Leffer and Gerald R. Podlesak of counsel), for respondent Karen V. Murphy (no memorandum filed).

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION JUDGMENT

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" (Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569; see, Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.


Summaries of

Matter of Jackson v. Orenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Jackson v. Orenstein

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ERWIN JACKSON, petitioner, v. JULES E. ORENSTEIN, etc.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 883