Opinion
Argued February 20, 1924
Decided April 1, 1924
Charles A. Van Auken for appellant.
John M. Holzworth for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Isenbarth v. Bartnett
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 1, 1924
143 N.E. 766 (N.Y. 1924)
Summaries of
Matter of Isenbarth v. Bartnett
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 1, 1924
143 N.E. 766 (N.Y. 1924)
Case details for
Matter of Isenbarth v. Bartnett
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of the Application of MARY ISENBARTH, Respondent, v …
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 1, 1924
Citations
143 N.E. 766 (N.Y. 1924)
143 N.E. 766
Citing Cases
Simon v. Needham
Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. 272 U.S. 365, 390. See Eubank v. Richmond, 226 U.S. 137, 144; Edwards v.…
Nectow v. CambridgeThese considerations cannot be weighed with exactness. That they demand the placing of the boundary of a zone…