From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Iannuzzi v. Town of Brookhaven

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1999
258 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 22, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing and without a statement of reasons in the absence of a showing that the termination was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, in bad faith, or in violation of statutory or decisional law (see, Matter of Bass v. New York City Tr. Auth., 236 A.D.2d 536). The petitioner failed to make such a showing.

In addition, contrary to the petitioner's assertion, the respondent's determination to discharge the petitioner was based upon his unsatisfactory performance and was not arbitrary and capricious, but had a rational basis and was carried out in good faith. The petitioner failed to meet his burden of presenting legal and competent evidence to show a deprivation of his rights, bad faith, or other arbitrary action constituting an abuse of discretion on the part of the respondent (see, Matter of Abbondandolo v. Edwards, 174 A.D.2d 737). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed this proceeding.

Miller, J. P., Ritter, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Iannuzzi v. Town of Brookhaven

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1999
258 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Iannuzzi v. Town of Brookhaven

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDMOND IANNUZZI, Appellant, v. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 784

Citing Cases

Razzano v. Remsenburg-Speonk UFSD

The petitioner contends that the respondents' purported economic rationale was a fiction, and was not an…

Miller v. Village of Wappingers Falls

Thus, they did not carry their burden of proof and their motion was properly denied. Moreover, even a…