From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hyde v. Levitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 11, 1979
72 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

October 11, 1979


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the State Comptroller. It is undisputed that the petitioner in the ordinary course of his employment was engaged in lifting a bottle of water when it slipped from his grasp at about chest height. He grabbed the bottle as it fell and sustained sharp pain across his back. The respondent has found that the event described does not constitute an accident within the meaning of section 63 Retire. Soc. Sec. of the Retirement and Social Security Law and, therefore, the petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement was denied. Upon this proceeding, the sole issue is whether or not the determination is supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Donohue v Levitt, 55 A.D.2d 240). Upon this record, it is apparent that the incident occurred in the ordinary performance of the work and, while there is some element of accident in the slipping of the bottle, it cannot be said that the event was accidental in nature as a matter of law (see Matter of Selinger v Levitt, 65 A.D.2d 668). "The risk * * * was inherent in such activity." (Matter of Tremblay v Levitt, 65 A.D.2d 901, 902.) Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Sweeney, Staley, Jr., Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Hyde v. Levitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 11, 1979
72 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Matter of Hyde v. Levitt

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALFRED HYDE, Petitioner, v. ARTHUR LEVITT, as New York…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 11, 1979

Citations

72 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Matter of Kuter v. Regan

He did not state that the rise in the floor was due to a defective condition or to a condition that was not…