From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hunkins v. Tofany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 25, 1972
38 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

February 25, 1972

Appeal from the Onondaga Special Term.

Present — Marsh, J.P., Gabrielli, Moule, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.


Determination unanimously modified on the facts and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of limiting the penalty to a 20-day suspension, and as so modified, determination confirmed, without costs. Memorandum: While the Commissioner's determination was supported by substantial evidence, we believe under all the circumstances present in this record that suspension of petitioner's license for 90 days is inordinately severe. Petitioner owns a 350-acre farm and requires his automobile to operate it. Prior to the instant proceeding he had an 18-year unblemished driving record. Accordingly, the suspension imposed is reduced to a period of 20 days ( Matter of Rubert v. Hults, 27 A.D.2d 934).


Summaries of

Matter of Hunkins v. Tofany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 25, 1972
38 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Matter of Hunkins v. Tofany

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT A. HUNKINS, Petitioner, v. VINCENT L. TOFANY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 25, 1972

Citations

38 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Matter of Truskolaski v. Passidomo

Although the determination of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles was supported by substantial evidence, we…