From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hui's Realty, Inc. v. Transcontinental Construction Services, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 1990
168 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 13, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.).


Lien Law § 11 requires a party to serve a notice of lien on the owner, and expressly states that failure to file proof of service within 35 days after the notice of lien is filed shall terminate the notice as a lien. The record at bar supports the IAS court's determination that the respondent did not file such proof of service. The language of Lien Law § 11 is clear and unambiguous. Although a court may disturb a harsh disposition that is not authorized by the statute (see, e.g., Tewari v. Tsoutsouras, 75 N.Y.2d 1; Kolb v. Strogh, 158 A.D.2d 15), no such leniency is authorized where, as here, the result is mandated by the statute.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Sullivan, Milonas, Rosenberger and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Hui's Realty, Inc. v. Transcontinental Construction Services, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 1990
168 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Hui's Realty, Inc. v. Transcontinental Construction Services, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HUI'S REALTY, INC., Respondent, v. TRANSCONTINENTAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 633

Citing Cases

Podolsky v. Narnoc Corp.

Petitioner, Stuart Podolsky, seeks reargument of the order of this court dated March 12th, 1991, which denied…

Mahan Constr. v. 373 Wythe

Mahan's mechanic's lien against the property is discharged due to insufficient service of the notice of lien…