Opinion
March 2, 2000
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 19, 1998, which, inter alia, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision reducing claimant's weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate to zero.
Robert T. Hughes, New Paltz, appellant in person.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Norman Uris of counsel), New York City, for respondent.
Before: CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, CREW III, PETERS and SPAIN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reducing claimant's benefit rate to zero. The record establishes that claimant's pension was wholly funded by his base period employers and claimant did not have the option of directly receiving the employer contributions. In addition, the amount of claimant's pension payments exceeded the maximum weekly unemployment benefit rate of $300 (see, Labor Law § 590 Lab. [5]). Accordingly, claimant's unemployment insurance benefits were properly reduced by the amount of his pension benefits (see, Labor Law § 600 Lab. [7]; Matter of De Salvo [Commissioner of Labor], 249 A.D.2d 619; Matter of Levin [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 642). Finally, claimant was properly charged with a recoverable overpayment of benefits (see, Matter of Brainin [Sweeney], 239 A.D.2d 639). Claimant's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.