From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Huff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 21, 1995
222 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 21, 1995

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant, a teacher's aide for the Buffalo Board of Education, was laid off during the summer of 1993, but instructed to return to work in September 1993. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied claimant's application for unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he was given a reasonable assurance of continued employment. Inasmuch as claimant does not dispute that he was advised to return to work in September 1993, we find that the Board's decision is supported by substantial evidence ( see, Matter of Bicjan [New York City Bd. of Educ. — Sweeney], 219 A.D.2d 751; Matter of Alexander, 136 A.D.2d 788).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Huff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 21, 1995
222 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Huff

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of DENNIS HUFF, Appellant. JOHN E. SWEENEY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 21, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 364

Citing Cases

Matter of Huff

We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the Board's decision ( see, Matter of Huff [Sweeney], 247 A.D.2d…

Matter of Huff

We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the Board's decision ( see, Matter of Huff [Sweeney], 222 A.D.2d…