From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hudson v. Villa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1994
204 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 27, 1994

Appeal from the Herkimer County Family Court, LaRaia, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Herkimer County Family Court (LaRaia, J.). We add only that Family Court properly determined that venue in Herkimer County was proper because petitioner resided there when the action was commenced (see, CPLR 503 [a]) and respondent failed to meet her burden of showing good cause for transfer of venue to Dutchess County (see, Family Ct Act § 174; CPLR 510; Matter of Tavolacci v Garges, 124 A.D.2d 734).


Summaries of

Matter of Hudson v. Villa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1994
204 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Hudson v. Villa

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TILLMAN HUDSON, Respondent, v. ELIDA VILLA, Also Known as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 27, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 960

Citing Cases

Matter of Pinkerton v. Pensyl

We conclude that the court's determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record ( see Matter of…

Devita v. Devita

We reject the mother's contention in both appeals that Family Court should have sua sponte transferred venue…