Opinion
June 15, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents and the intervenor-respondent appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the respondents fulfilled their obligations to explore reasonable alternatives and mitigate adverse impacts upon cultural resources by adopting the recommendation of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (see, PRHPL 14.09; Matter of Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine v. Dormitory Auth., 224 A.D.2d 95, 101; Matter of Ebert v. New York State Off. of Parks, Recreation Historic Preservation, 119 A.D.2d 62). Accordingly, the petition was properly denied.
To the extent that the petitioner's remaining contentions are properly before us, they are without merit.
Thompson, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.