From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hoyer v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 29, 1996
224 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 29, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Clinton County.


Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of possessing escape items and exchanging unauthorized items after correction officers confiscated a life-sized, wooden monkey head and other items, including unfinished imitation body parts, from his cell. As a penalty, he was given 365 days confinement in the Special Housing Unit and the loss of certain privileges. Petitioner challenges this determination, contending, inter alia, that it is not supported by substantial evidence. Initially, inasmuch as respondents concede that the unauthorized exchange charge should be annulled and expunged from petitioner's records, we find that the determination must be modified in this regard. Nevertheless, with respect to the possession of escape items charge, we find that the misbehavior report, combined with the testimony of the correction officer who prepared it and the testimony of petitioner, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt. Finally, contrary to petitioner's claim, we do not find that the penalty imposed was excessive.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is modified and petition granted, in part, by reversing so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of exchanging unauthorized items, and, as so modified, confirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Hoyer v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 29, 1996
224 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Hoyer v. Coombe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM HOYER, Petitioner, v. PHILIP COOMBE, as Acting…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 29, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 514

Citing Cases

Levi v. Lauro

The respondents correctly concede that specification 40 is unsupported by substantial evidence. Therefore, we…

In re Sergio Tavarez

However, while such an item may be innocuous in many situations, when possessed by an inmate after an escape…