From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Houston

Supreme Court of South Carolina
May 23, 1978
247 S.E.2d 315 (S.C. 1978)

Opinion

20699

May 23, 1978.

Atty. Gen. Daniel R. McLeod, Asst. Attys. Gen. Richard B. Kale, Jr., A. Camden Lewis, George C. Beighley and Perry M. Buckner, Columbia, for complaint.

John Bolt Culbertson, Greenville, for respondent.

Joel Berger, New York City, and Russell Brown, Charleston, amici curiae.


May 23, 1978.


This is a disciplinary proceeding in which respondent is charged with offering his services to several persons involved in the same automobile accident, and with failing to promptly pay a client a settlement check received in her behalf. The panel recommended indefinite suspension. We conclude respondent's misconduct warrants a public reprimand.

Respondent allegedly went to the home of Esau Bowman and requested to represent Elizabeth Bowman and her daughter, Mary Ann, in litigation involving an automobile accident. Subsequently, respondent negotiated a settlement of Mary Ann Bowman's claims and received a $3,000.00 check on her behalf. Respondent retained this check for eight months and was unable to account for the funds during most of that time.

Respondent maintains he could not disburse the proceeds of the check until settlement of a claim by the Department of Social Services (DSS) against Ms. Bowman for assistance received while she was hospitalized. While it is true that DSS was entitled to a portion of the settlement proceeds, this does not justify respondent's lengthy retention of the check.

In respondent's behalf, it is uncontroverted that he early tendered $500.00 of the settlement proceeds to Ms. Bowman, but she refused to accept it. Prior to initiation of this disciplinary proceeding, Ms. Bowman accepted tender of $700.00, the full amount due to her following payment to DSS.

We conclude respondent's actions constitute serious violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. However, as he has no prior record of misconduct and the charges here relate to one isolated event, we believe a public reprimand is the proper sanction. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded by this Court.


I dissent. I would indefinitely suspend respondent.


Summaries of

Matter of Houston

Supreme Court of South Carolina
May 23, 1978
247 S.E.2d 315 (S.C. 1978)
Case details for

Matter of Houston

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Charles Edward HOUSTON, Jr., Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: May 23, 1978

Citations

247 S.E.2d 315 (S.C. 1978)
247 S.E.2d 315

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Houston

       The findings of the Hearing Panel, which were adopted by the Executive Committee, outline a long…