From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Horn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 10, 1994
201 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 10, 1994

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the Board's conclusion that Randi Horn, doing business as REH Marketing Company, a partnership, exercised sufficient direction and control over the product demonstrators to establish their status as employees. Once the demonstrators accepted an assignment from REH Marketing, it mailed them all pertinent paperwork about the job, including detailed invoice forms, instruction sheets and samples. The demonstrators were paid on a weekly basis upon completion of the invoices. Payment was made even if the product manufacturer had not paid REH Marketing yet. The demonstrators were also reimbursed for certain types of expenses. Finally, the fact that the demonstrators' contracts stated that they were independent contractors is not determinative.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Horn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 10, 1994
201 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Horn

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RANDI HORN, Doing Business as REH MARKETING COMPANY, a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 10, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 498

Citing Cases

Waggoneer v. Preston Leasing Corp.

On occasion, Preston would contact its clients to review and critique claimant's work at the promotional…

New Team, LLC v. Comm'r of Labor

New Team would also contact brand ambassadors regarding any incomplete recap reports and/or if their…