From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hopkins v. Blum

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1983
58 N.Y.2d 1011 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Argued February 14, 1983

Decided March 22, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division in the Second Judicial Department.

Douglas Ruff and Leonard S. Clark for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Maryellen Weinberg, Peter H. Schiff and Daphne Fuller of counsel), for respondents.



Judgment affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 87 A.D.2d 613) to which we add that, although the notice of denial of benefits was defective for the further reason that it failed to state the regulation supporting the action as required by 45 C.F.R. § 205.10 (a) (4) (i) (B), that defect also was waived by petitioner's counsel's failure to raise the defect at the hearing.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG, MEYER and SIMONS.


Summaries of

Matter of Hopkins v. Blum

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1983
58 N.Y.2d 1011 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Matter of Hopkins v. Blum

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LEE HOPKINS, on Behalf of Herself and Her Minor Child…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 22, 1983

Citations

58 N.Y.2d 1011 (N.Y. 1983)
461 N.Y.S.2d 1013
448 N.E.2d 798

Citing Cases

Matter Summers v. D'Elia

At the outset, it should be noted that the notice of intent to reduce petitioner's grant of public assistance…

Matter of Hamler v. D'Elia

Petitioner initiated this proceeding to, inter alia, review the determination of the State commissioner. The…