From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Holmes v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 24, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Livingston County, Cicoria, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ.


Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Although the literature concerning the Syva EMIT Drug Detection System Test (EMIT test) was revised by the manufacturer in 1989 to advise that "[a] more specific alternative chemical method must be used to obtain a confirmed analytical result", the manufacturer nonetheless continues to assert that the EMIT test remains scientifically valid and reliable with a 99% rate of accuracy. Therefore, the two positive EMIT drug test results sufficiently support respondents' determination that petitioner used illegal drugs (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 N.Y.2d 135, 143; Matter of McGill v Coughlin, 182 A.D.2d 1103 [decided herewith]; Matter of Maldonado v Selsky, 162 A.D.2d 843, 844).


Summaries of

Matter of Holmes v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Holmes v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CARL HOLMES, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
583 N.Y.S.2d 703

Citing Cases

Matter of Saldana v. Coombe

The calibration strips from the EMIT drug detection system in fact indicated that the test result was…

Matter of Montalvo v. Goord

Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ. Determination unanimously confirmed without…