From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Holm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 15, 1994
201 A.D.2d 41 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

July 15, 1994

Paul J. Ginnelly, Syracuse, for petitioner.

Michael J. Vavonese, Syracuse, for respondent.


Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court on April 2, 1969 and maintained an office for the practice of law in Syracuse. On February 9, 1994, he entered a plea of guilty to mail fraud and bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and 1344 in the Federal District Court for the Northern District of New York. On February 16, 1994, this Court entered an order suspending respondent pending further order of the Court and directing him to show cause why a final order of disbarment should not be entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) and (e). On April 11, 1994, respondent was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 21 months.

We conclude that the Federal felonies of which respondent was convicted are essentially similar to the New York crimes of grand larceny in the second and third degrees, class C and D felonies in violation of Penal Law §§ 155.40 and 155.35, and scheme to defraud in the first degree, a class E felony, in violation of Penal Law § 190.65 (see, Matter of Maloney, 190 A.D.2d 191; Matter of Fury, 145 A.D.2d 259). Accordingly, petitioner is automatically disbarred pursuant to the provisions of Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) and (e).

DENMAN, P.J., GREEN, PINE, FALLON and CALLAHAN, JJ., concur.

Order of disbarment entered.


Summaries of

Matter of Holm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 15, 1994
201 A.D.2d 41 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Holm

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MELVIN E. HOLM, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 15, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 41 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 291

Citing Cases

Matter of Sinker

We conclude that the Federal offense of mail fraud of which respondent was convicted is essentially similar…

In re Swartz

On August 29, 1997, respondent was sentenced in Federal District Court to concurrent terms of imprisonment of…