From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hoffman v. Treadwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 1995
222 A.D.2d 243 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 7, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Joan Lobis, J.].


The record contains substantial evidence that petitioner did not work exclusively for any employer and thus the work he claimed as qualifying experience was not exempt from the licensure requirement (General Business Law § 83; see, Norwood v Ward, 46 F.2d 312, 314, affd sub nom. Norwood v Bennett, 283 U.S. 800). Since nonexempt work performed without a license is unlawful (General Business Law § 70), respondent's refusal to count such work as qualifying "equivalent" experience under General Business Law § 72 (1) was eminently reasonable.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Hoffman v. Treadwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 1995
222 A.D.2d 243 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Hoffman v. Treadwell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PETER HOFFMAN, Petitioner, v. ALEXANDER F. TREADWELL, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 7, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 243 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 189