Opinion
Argued November 20, 1928
Decided December 4, 1928
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
Albert Ottinger, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for appellant. William C. Hawver for Chatham Electric Light, Heat and Power Company et al., respondents.
James J. Mahoney and George J. Stacy for New York Window Cleaning Co., Inc., et al., respondents.
T. Carlyle Jones and Bernard J. Vincent for respondents.
Under our ruling in Matter of Marhoffer v. Marhoffer ( 220 N.Y. 543) awards for injuries may not properly be consecutive.
The question of the application of subdivision 3-u of section 15 of the Workmen's Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67) is not before us on these appeals.
The orders should be affirmed with costs against the State Industrial Board and the questions certified answered in the negative.
CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, ANDREWS, LEHMAN, KELLOGG and O'BRIEN, JJ., concur.
Orders affirmed, etc.