From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hoffman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 7, 1998
254 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 7, 1998


We conclude that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order which disbarred him and with the provisions of this Court's rule governing the conduct of disbarred attorneys ( 22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that he has complied with the requirements of this Court's rule regulating reinstatement ( 22 NYCRR 806.12) and that he possesses the requisite character and fitness to resume the practice of law.

However, mindful of the circumstances of respondent's disbarment, we condition respondent's reinstatement to practice upon his association, during the first three years in which he engages in the private practice of law, with an attorney who has at least five years of experience as a private practitioner. During such period, respondent shall submit semiannual reports to petitioner confirming and detailing the initial and continuing association. Petitioner shall report any failure to meet said condition or reporting requirement to this Court.

Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, upon the conditions set forth herein, effective immediately.

Cardona, P. J., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent's application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, upon the conditions set forth in the decision herein, effective immediately.


Summaries of

Matter of Hoffman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 7, 1998
254 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Hoffman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARK W. HOFFMAN, a Disbarred Attorney, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 537

Citing Cases

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Brollesy (In re Brollesy)

Further, we agree with the subcommittee that respondent has largely resolved the concerns underlying the…