From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Hoare v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 27, 1963
20 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

December 27, 1963


Decision affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur; Bergan, P.J., and Gibson, J., dissent and vote to reverse and remit for an unequivocal determination whether or not the disease, as shown on this record, is an occupational disease in the light of the medical and other proof indicating a recognizable link between the employment and the disabling condition.


Summaries of

Claim of Hoare v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 27, 1963
20 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Claim of Hoare v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of HANORA HOARE, Appellant, v. GREAT ATLANTIC…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 27, 1963

Citations

20 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)