From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hirschberg v. Reavy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1943
267 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Opinion

December 10, 1943.

Present — Townley, Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.


The petitioner has failed to show that he has a clear legal right to the remedy he sought. The State Civil Service Commission cannot be directed to certify the petitioner for payment of salary without a prior certification by the Board of Justices as required by rule XXII of the Rules for Classified Civil Service. The Board of Justices of the First Judicial District was not made a party to this proceeding. The petitioner's remedy, if any, is by way of plenary suit. Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion for a peremptory order denied.


Summaries of

Matter of Hirschberg v. Reavy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1943
267 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Case details for

Matter of Hirschberg v. Reavy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDGAR HIRSCHBERG, Respondent, against GRACE A. REAVY et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1943

Citations

267 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Citing Cases

MATTER OF FAY v. Lyons

The petitioner was not presented with formal written charges for his dismissal until June 5, 1951. It…

Fay v. Lyons

It has been held in a number of cases that where there is no authority to suspend an employee pending removal…