From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hill v. Samaritan Hospital

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 16, 1948
81 N.E.2d 79 (N.Y. 1948)

Summary

In Hill v. Samaritan Hospital, 298 N.Y. 182, 81 N.E.2d 79, it was held within the literal terms of the statute that the twelve-month period required by Section 40 between the contracting of the disease and disablement must be shown; that disablement is related to contraction of disease and not to exposure to it.

Summary of this case from Matter of Cerame v. Midland Rochester Co.

Opinion

Submitted June 9, 1948

Decided July 16, 1948

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Jeremiah F. Connor for appellants. Fred J. Murray for respondents.


The finding of the Workmen's Compensation Board that the claimant became disabled on February 10, 1942, as a result of pulmonary tuberculosis, an occupational disease which was due to the nature of her employment and was contracted by her within twelve months previous to the date of her disablement is supported by the evidence. Such finding, when taken in connection with the finding that she completed her training as an affiliate student nurse at the New York Hospital on May 1, 1940, brings her claim against the appellant, New York Hospital, within the statutory limitation of time barring recovery of compensation benefits "unless the disease is * * * contracted * * * within the twelve months previous to the date of disablement". It is the contraction of the occupational disease rather than exposure that commences the running of the statutory time limit. After giving maximum effect to such limitation more than twelve months elapsed after claimant left the New York Hospital before it may be said she had contracted the disease. An award of compensation benefits for disability due to occupational disease under such circumstances is barred by the statute (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 40; Matter of Crowley v. Yonkers Herald Pub. Co., 250 App. Div. 670, affd. 275 N.Y. 571).

The order of the Appellate Division and the award of the Workmen's Compensation Board should be modified in accordance with the opinion herein, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division to appellant New York Hospital, and the matter remitted to the Workmen's Compensation Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion herein.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ., concur; CONWAY, J., taking no part.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Hill v. Samaritan Hospital

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 16, 1948
81 N.E.2d 79 (N.Y. 1948)

In Hill v. Samaritan Hospital, 298 N.Y. 182, 81 N.E.2d 79, it was held within the literal terms of the statute that the twelve-month period required by Section 40 between the contracting of the disease and disablement must be shown; that disablement is related to contraction of disease and not to exposure to it.

Summary of this case from Matter of Cerame v. Midland Rochester Co.
Case details for

Matter of Hill v. Samaritan Hospital

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARGUERITE D. HILL, Respondent, against…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 16, 1948

Citations

81 N.E.2d 79 (N.Y. 1948)
81 N.E.2d 79

Citing Cases

Matter of Seifer v. Kings Park State Hospital

In these circumstances the claim for disability due to occupational disease was barred by statute. (Workmen's…

Matter of Cerame v. Midland Rochester Co.

Jurisdictional conditions are not supplied by statutory waivers related to other matters. That the…