From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hill v. Bd. of Educ. of Cent. Sch. Dist No. 2

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 28, 1955
132 N.E.2d 315 (N.Y. 1955)

Opinion

Argued November 14, 1955

Decided December 28, 1955

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, HUGHES, J.

Richmond D. Moot for appellant.

Roy W. Peters for respondent.

Charles A. Brind, Jr., John P. John, Elizabeth M. Eastman and George B. Farrington for James E. Allen, Jr., Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, amicus curiae, in support of respondent's position.

Vandewater, Sykes, Heckler Galloway, amicus curiae, in support of respondent's position.


Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ. Taking no part: DYE, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Hill v. Bd. of Educ. of Cent. Sch. Dist No. 2

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 28, 1955
132 N.E.2d 315 (N.Y. 1955)
Case details for

Matter of Hill v. Bd. of Educ. of Cent. Sch. Dist No. 2

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DUDLEY T. HILL, Appellant, against BOARD OF EDUCATION OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 28, 1955

Citations

132 N.E.2d 315 (N.Y. 1955)
132 N.E.2d 315

Citing Cases

O'Brien v. N.Y. Comm'r of Educ.

The questions are whether the School District “contract[ed] indebtedness” when it passed a resolution…

Matter of Walter v. Board of Educ

There is no obligation on the part of the board of education to pay a teacher who is reinstated any more than…