From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Higby v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 14, 1979
71 A.D.2d 1047 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

September 14, 1979

Appeal from the Erie Supreme Court.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr and Witmer, JJ. (Decided Aug. 22, 1979.)


Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner seeks to have his designating petition validated for the position of councilman in the Town of Orchard Park, which is wholly within one assembly district. The election district number was inserted in the statement of each subscribing witness but the number of the assembly district was omitted. For the reasons stated in Matter of Vari v. Hayduk ( 59 A.D.2d 571) we would affirm; but under constraint of the reversal of that decision ( 42 N.Y.2d 980) and similar holdings by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Morris v. Hayduk ( 45 N.Y.2d 793) and Matter of Rutter v. Coveney ( 38 N.Y.2d 993) we reverse.


Summaries of

Matter of Higby v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 14, 1979
71 A.D.2d 1047 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Matter of Higby v. Mahoney

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PAUL H. HIGBY, Respondent, v. EDWARD J. MAHONEY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 14, 1979

Citations

71 A.D.2d 1047 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)