From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hess v. Di Pronio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 1, 1983
96 A.D.2d 1134 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

September 1, 1983

Appeal from the Seneca Supreme Court, Henry, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Denman, O'Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition granted. Memorandum. Section 6-130 Elec. of the Election Law requires each signer of a designating petition to provide his "residence address." A post-office box number is not a residence address as required by the statute. The signatures on lines 1, 9 and 10 of the designating petition are accompanied only by post-office box numbers and are, therefore, invalid. Since the designating petition does not contain the required number of valid signatures, it must be invalidated.


Summaries of

Hess v. Di Pronio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 1, 1983
96 A.D.2d 1134 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Hess v. Di Pronio

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SALLY J. HESS, Appellant, v. LENA DI PRONIO et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1983

Citations

96 A.D.2d 1134 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Matter of Liepshutz v. Palmateer

Election Law § 6-132 (2) mandates that the witness statement contain, inter alia, the residence address of…

Fibernet Telecom Group v. East Coast Optical

Respondent has cited no cases, and the Court has found none, which permit a lienor to use a post office box…