From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Herman v. Blum

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 1981
425 N.E.2d 898 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Decided June 30, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, IRWIN BROWNSTEIN, J.

Morton B. Dicker, Julian Z. Meltzer and John P. Cunningham for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Gerald Slotnik and Arlene Silverman of counsel), for respondent.


On summary consideration, order affirmed, without costs. There is substantial evidence to support the commissioner's determination that petitioner's failure to accept his work referral was without good cause (see Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 N.Y.2d 354, 358). The asserted evidentiary errors have not been preserved for judicial review because of the absence of a specific objection or request for an adjournment to remedy the asserted defects (Matter of Sowa v Looney, 23 N.Y.2d 329, 333; Matter of Leogrande v State Liq. Auth., 19 N.Y.2d 418, 423).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Matter of Herman v. Blum

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 1981
425 N.E.2d 898 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

Matter of Herman v. Blum

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WESLEY HERMAN, Appellant, v. BARBARA BLUM, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 30, 1981

Citations

425 N.E.2d 898 (N.Y. 1981)
425 N.E.2d 898
442 N.Y.S.2d 510

Citing Cases

Matter of McKeon v. Brezenoff

The commissioner's determination that petitioner's failure to report for referral to a work program was…

Matter of Kirk v. Hammock

The certificate of conviction in the instant case must, therefore, be viewed as sufficient to constitute…