From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 14, 1950
277 AD 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion


277 A.D. 403 100 N.Y.S.2d 542 In the Matter of MORRIS H. HERMAN, an Attorney, Respondent. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Petitioner. Supreme Court of New York, First Department. November 14, 1950

         DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS instituted by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Respondent was admitted to the Bar March 4, 1935, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department.

         COUNSEL

          George J. Hunter, Jr., of counsel (Frank H. Gordon, attorney), for petitioner.

          No appearance by respondent.

          Per Curiam.

          Four specific charges of professional misconduct were set forth against respondent. The first and fourth respectively grew out of complaints of gross neglect of the interests of two clients. The second and third charges arose by virtue of claims of abuse of process by respondent. Extended hearings upon the charges were held by the Official Referee designated by this court to take testimony. His report to the court contains the following: 'It is unnecessary to elaborate with detail the inescapable inference that the respondent has very little regard for his profession and no respect or consideration for the importance of this proceeding. As regards the charges against the respondent the testimony in proof thereof is clear and unmistakable. The defense proposed is specious, contradictory and unbelievable.'

          A reading of the record discloses a degree of utter irresponsibility and lack of good faith by respondent in dealings with his clients as well as with the courts. The evidence fully supports the findings of the Official Referee sustaining the charges and the petitioner's motion to confirm his report should be granted. Respondent has demonstrated his unfitness to remain a member of the profession and he should be disbarred.

          GLENNON, J. P., DORE, COHN, VAN VOORHIS and SHIENTAG, JJ., concur.

          Respondent disbarred.

Summaries of

Matter of Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 14, 1950
277 AD 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Matter of Herman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MORRIS H. HERMAN, an Attorney, Respondent. ASSOCIATION OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 14, 1950

Citations

277 AD 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
277 App. Div. 403
100 N.Y.S.2d 542

Citing Cases

Matter of Schwartz

The report of the Referee is confirmed. Respondent failed to protect the interest of certain clients and, as…