From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Henshaw v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 11, 1997
242 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 11, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.


Petitioner applied for disability retirement benefits due to back injuries he sustained while performing his duties as a State Trooper. Petitioner's application was denied upon a finding that he was not permanently disabled. Substantial evidence supports the determination. William Rogers, an orthopedic surgeon who testified on behalf of respondent New York State Police and Fire Retirement System, opined that, based upon his examination of petitioner and his review of various medical reports and test results, petitioner was capable of performing the duties of a State Trooper. Although petitioner's medical expert testified to the contrary, it is for respondent Comptroller to evaluate and resolve conflicting medical evidence even when this involves accepting one medical opinion over that of another ( see, Matter of Jetter v. McCall, 241 A.D.2d 746; Matter of Dubois v. McCall, 239 A.D.2d 774).

Cardona, P.J., White, Casey, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Henshaw v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 11, 1997
242 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Henshaw v. McCall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN E. HENSHAW, Petitioner, v. H. CARL McCALL, as New…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 11, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
661 N.Y.S.2d 1019

Citing Cases

Matter of Kreppein v. N.Y.S. Local Police

Following a hearing, the Comptroller denied the application upon finding that petitioner was not…