From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Henschel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 14, 1945
269 App. Div. 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Opinion

December 14, 1945.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County.


On the record before the court, we are unable to determine the reasonableness of the rentals fixed at Special Term. As stated in Matter of Frankel ( Hatters' Oakhide Boxes) ( ante, p. 531), the trial court should render a decision indicating the findings upon which its disposition is made.

The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed and the matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedings accordingly, with costs and disbursements to the appellant to abide the event.

Martin, P.J., Townley, Cohn, Callahan and Wasservogel, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed upon questions of law and the matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion of this court, with costs and disbursements to the appellant to abide the event.


Summaries of

Matter of Henschel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 14, 1945
269 App. Div. 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Case details for

Matter of Henschel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RUTH B. HENSCHEL, Appellant. ANTHONY LEVATINO, Doing…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1945

Citations

269 App. Div. 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)