From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Henry v. Blake

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 24, 1994
207 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

August 24, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant conceded at oral argument that his counterclaim to validate his designating petition was untimely. Thus, the issue of whether the Board of Elections of the City of New York incorrectly determined that certain signatures were invalid was not properly before the Supreme Court (see, Matter of Krueger v Richards, 59 N.Y.2d 680; Matter of Suarez v. Sadowski, 48 N.Y.2d 620). Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Henry v. Blake

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 24, 1994
207 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Henry v. Blake

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARGARET HENRY et al., Respondents, v. JAMES BLAKE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 24, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 246

Citing Cases

Matter of Rodriguez v. Nieves

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Since the appellant brought no…

In re Appl. of Cadel v. Suffolk Cty. Bd. of Elect.

The failure to file the cross petition with the County Clerk is fatal ( seeMatter of White v Bilal, 21 AD3d…