From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hendricks v. Scully

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 11, 1994
206 A.D.2d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

July 11, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner asserts that he was denied a fair hearing because the Hearing Officer refused to admit a copy of a complaint the petitioner lodged against a correction officer prior to the officer's filing of the misbehavior report which was the subject of the hearing. The evidence in question was properly ruled inadmissible as having no relevance to the charges under consideration (see, Matter of Hop-Wah v. Coughlin, 118 A.D.2d 275, revd on other grounds 69 N.Y.2d 791). Furthermore, the petitioner's allegation that the Hearing Officer's evidentiary ruling demonstrated that person's disbelief in the petitioner's claim of retaliation does not support the petitioner's assertion that the determination under review was affected by bias (see, Matter of McCoy v. Leonardo, 175 A.D.2d 358). Bracken, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Hendricks v. Scully

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 11, 1994
206 A.D.2d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Hendricks v. Scully

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BURNELL HENDRICKS, Appellant, v. CHARLES J. SCULLY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 11, 1994

Citations

206 A.D.2d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 539

Citing Cases

Matter of Williams v. Selsky

Turning to petitioner's procedural arguments, we reject the contention that petitioner was denied documentary…

Matter of Rowlett v. Coombe

We reject petitioner's contention that he was denied relevant documentary evidence, i.e., a copy of a cell…