From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Heintz v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 24, 1991
178 A.D.2d 333 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

December 24, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline W. Silbermann, J.).


While on duty, petitioner, a New York City police officer, entered the women's bathroom, slipped and fell on a puddle of water, and injured her back. Petitioner's account of the incident was confirmed by an eyewitness, but her supervisor, who investigated the claim that same day, denied line-of-duty designation on the ground that petitioner was negligent in failing to perceive a risk in treading on an obviously wet floor, which conclusion was ultimately adopted by respondent after further review. Petitioner takes issue, arguing that her injury was incurred "without fault or misconduct" on her part within the meaning of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 12-127 (b). Given that petitioner's supervisor investigated the incident the day it occurred and questioned petitioner immediately thereafter, and that his denial of the claim was later reviewed by respondent Commissioner, it cannot be said that there was no rational basis for respondent's exercise of discretion or that the action complained of was arbitrary and capricious.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Heintz v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 24, 1991
178 A.D.2d 333 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Heintz v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KAREN HEINTZ, Appellant, v. LEE P. BROWN, as Police…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1991

Citations

178 A.D.2d 333 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
577 N.Y.S.2d 397

Citing Cases

Matter of Heintz v. Brown

Decided March 26, 1992 Appeal from (1st Dept: 178 A.D.2d 333) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…