From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Heimsoth

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1931
175 N.E. 112 (N.Y. 1931)

Opinion

Argued January 6, 1931

Decided February 10, 1931

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Arthur T. O'Leary for appellant.

Chase Mellen and Einar Chrystie for respondent.


We hold that in the circumstances of this case the appellant was under an active duty to see to it that the pendency of the separation suit be brought to the notice of the court upon the inquest for default of an answer in the action for annulment.

The order should be affirmed.

CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ., concur; KELLOGG, J., not sitting.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Heimsoth

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1931
175 N.E. 112 (N.Y. 1931)
Case details for

Matter of Heimsoth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH W. HEIMSOTH, an Attorney, Appellant. ASSOCIATION…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 10, 1931

Citations

175 N.E. 112 (N.Y. 1931)
175 N.E. 112

Citing Cases

Matter of Isaacs

"These and all kindred practices are unprofessional and unworthy of an officer of the law charged, as is the…

Buckingham v. Alden

Falloon v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 79 Cal.App. 149. Francis v. Superior Court of Los Angeles…